Daily Signal: Patch Latency Is Outpacing Exploit Latency Across Infrastructure Layers

Welcome reader, here’s today’s Cyber Briefing Note.

Brought to you by:

Smallstep – Secures Wi-Fi, VPNs, ZTNA, SaaS and APIs with hardware-bound credentials powered by ACME Device Attestation

 LockThreat – AI-powered GRC that replaces legacy tools and unifies compliance, risk, audit and vendor management in one platform

About CybersecurityHQ

CybersecurityHQ delivers analyst-grade cyber intelligence used by CISOs and security leaders inside the Fortune 100. Each briefing diagnoses structural security failures across identity, machine trust, third-party access, and enterprise attack surfaces—designed to inform executive judgment, not react to headlines.

—

Subscriber access includes weekly CISO briefings, deep-dive intelligence reports, premium research, and supporting tools. $399/year. Corporate plans available.

Listen to the 2-minute Daily CISO Briefing on Spotify.

Executive Snapshot

Over the past 48 hours, multiple disclosures surfaced across industrial router infrastructure, enterprise VoIP systems, desktop compression utilities, and Windows kernel components. These disclosures did not share attackers, tooling, or infrastructure. What they shared was exposure at patch boundaries where remediation velocity has failed to keep pace with exploit weaponization. Each signal reflects a different surface of the same structural condition: known vulnerabilities persisting in production environments long past patch availability.

Scope Lock

This pattern is present if your organization operates network infrastructure with end-of-life products still in production, deploys VoIP or PBX systems with non-default authentication configurations, permits user-controlled file operations without archive format restrictions, or runs Windows systems where cloud file synchronization components are present. In most enterprise environments, all four conditions apply simultaneously.

Signal 1: Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS Routers Now Under Active Exploitation

CISA added CVE-2018-4063 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on December 13, 2025, following confirmed active exploitation. The vulnerability is an unrestricted file upload flaw in Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS routers that enables remote code execution via HTTP request. The flaw was first disclosed in 2018 by Cisco Talos. Sierra Wireless AirLink devices are deployed in operational technology environments including cellular towers, vehicle fleets, and remote infrastructure. CISA notes the affected products have reached end-of-life and end-of-service status. Federal agencies must patch or discontinue use by January 2, 2026. Source category: federal vulnerability catalog.

What this exposes: Infrastructure devices that reach end-of-support do not disappear from production networks. They remain in service because replacement requires coordination that security teams cannot compel. The vulnerability is seven years old. The exploitation is happening now.

Signal 2: FreePBX Authentication Bypass Enables Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

Horizon3.ai disclosed three vulnerabilities in FreePBX affecting the Endpoint Manager module: CVE-2025-66039 (authentication bypass, CVSS 9.3), CVE-2025-61675 (SQL injection, CVSS 8.6), and CVE-2025-61678 (arbitrary file upload, CVSS 8.6). When chained together, these flaws allow unauthenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution on FreePBX instances. The authentication bypass requires non-default configuration but once exploited enables database manipulation and webshell deployment. FreePBX is an open-source VoIP management platform deployed across enterprise telephony infrastructure. Patches were released in December 2025. A prior FreePBX vulnerability, CVE-2025-57819, was added to CISA KEV in September 2025 following active exploitation. Source category: security research disclosure.

What this exposes: Unified communications platforms are servers with telephony capabilities. They share the same vulnerability lifecycle as any other web application but often exist outside standard patch management programs because they are classified as telephony infrastructure.

Signal 3: WinRAR CVE-2025-6218 Under Active Exploitation by Multiple Nation-State Groups

CISA added CVE-2025-6218 to the KEV catalog on December 9, 2025, citing active exploitation. The path traversal vulnerability in WinRAR enables code execution when a user opens a malicious archive, with exploitation placing files in sensitive locations including the Windows Startup folder. RARLAB patched the flaw in WinRAR 7.12 in June 2025. However, WinRAR does not support automatic updates. Security vendors including BI.ZONE, Foresiet, and Synaptic Security have documented exploitation by three distinct threat actors: GOFFEE targeting Russian organizations, Bitter APT targeting South Asian entities, and Gamaredon targeting Ukrainian institutions using the vulnerability to deploy Pteranodon malware and GamaWiper. Federal agencies must remediate by December 30, 2025. Source category: federal vulnerability catalog.

What this exposes: Desktop utilities that do not auto-update create permanent exploit surfaces regardless of patch availability. The vulnerability was patched in June. The exploitation accelerated in December. The gap between patch release and patch adoption is the operational attack surface.

Signal 4: Microsoft December Patch Tuesday Addresses Actively Exploited Windows Zero-Day

Microsoft's December 2025 Patch Tuesday addressed 57 vulnerabilities including CVE-2025-62221, an actively exploited use-after-free elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver. The flaw enables local attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. Microsoft credited MSTIC and MSRC with discovery but disclosed no exploitation details. CISA added CVE-2025-62221 to the KEV catalog on December 9, 2025, with a remediation deadline of December 30, 2025. The Cloud Files minifilter is present even when cloud synchronization applications are not installed. Microsoft patched 1,129 vulnerabilities across 2025, the second consecutive year exceeding one thousand CVEs. Source category: vendor security bulletin.

What this exposes: Privilege escalation vulnerabilities are post-compromise primitives. They are exploited after initial access has already been achieved. The exploitation of CVE-2025-62221 indicates active intrusion chains where attackers already have presence and are now escalating.

Structural Analysis

Each disclosure occurred at a patch boundary: between vulnerability disclosure and end-of-life product retirement, between VoIP infrastructure and web application security programs, between desktop utility patch availability and user adoption, between monthly security updates and active intrusion chains.

The convergence within a single 48-hour window is probability, not coordination. When patch latency conditions are present across domains, independent disclosures will cluster in any sufficiently large observation window.

But the pattern reveals something deeper: attackers now select vulnerabilities because patch latency exists, not despite it. Exploit development has inverted. Old CVEs are not liabilities that age out. They are assets that appreciate. A seven-year-old vulnerability in an end-of-life router is more valuable today than when it was disclosed because organizational inertia has had seven years to calcify around it.

What This Exposes

The assumption that patch availability equals patch deployment. The belief that end-of-life declarations result in product retirement. The gap between security update release and organizational adoption. The persistence of post-compromise tools exploiting flaws that were fixed months or years prior.

The structural lie enterprises are operating under: that vulnerability severity determines risk. It does not. Patch latency determines risk. A CVSS 7.8 with six months of organizational inertia is more dangerous than a CVSS 9.8 patched in 72 hours. Attackers have learned this. Defenders have not.

Executive Translation

The board question this answers: "Are we measuring patch availability or patch presence, and do we know which systems in our environment have exceeded their supportable lifecycle?"

Diagnostic Takeaway

Multiple domains disclosed within 48 hours not because attacks coordinated, but because structural patch latency conditions exist independently. Industrial routers with seven-year-old vulnerabilities, VoIP systems outside patch management programs, desktop utilities without auto-update capability, and privilege escalation flaws exploited in active intrusions are present across enterprises regardless of sector. The shared failure is remediation parity: the gap between when patches become available and when they reach production systems.

That gap persists because patching carries downside and delay does not. No executive faces consequences for a vulnerability that was exploitable but unexploited. Every executive faces consequences for downtime caused by a patch that broke production. The incentive structure rewards inaction. Attackers have built their operational model around this. Enterprises have not acknowledged it.

Decision and corrective implications are addressed in this week's CISO Briefing.

Author
Daniel Michan is the founder of CybersecurityHQ, a CISO-grade intelligence platform read weekly across the Fortune 100. He analyzes identity-centric risk, machine identity failures, SaaS integration breakdowns, and emerging AI-speed threats, producing executive briefings and deep-dive research used by enterprise security leaders for decision support.