Post-incident insurance gaps: Identifying uncovered cybersecurity losses across industry sectors

Welcome reader to a 🔒 pro subscriber-only deep dive 🔒.

Brought to you by:

👣 Smallstep – Secures Wi-Fi, VPNs, ZTNA, SaaS and APIs with hardware-bound credentials powered by ACME Device Attestation

🏄‍♀️ Upwind Security – Real-time cloud security that connects runtime to build-time to stop threats and boost DevSecOps productivity

🔧 Endor Labs – App security from legacy C++ to Bazel monorepos, with reachability-based risk detection and fix suggestions across the SDLC

 📊 LockThreat – AI-powered GRC that replaces legacy tools and unifies compliance, risk, audit and vendor management in one platform

🧠 Ridge Security – The AI-powered offensive security validation platform

Forwarded this email? Join 70,000 weekly readers by signing up now.

#OpenToWork? Try our AI Resume Builder to boost your chances of getting hired!

—

Get lifetime access to our deep dives, weekly cyber intel podcast report, premium content, AI Resume Builder, and more — all for just $799. Corporate plans are now available too.

Executive Summary

The cyber insurance landscape of 2025 presents a paradox: while global cyber insurance premiums have reached unprecedented levels of $15.3 billion with declining rates favoring buyers, organizations continue to experience catastrophic coverage gaps when they need protection most. Recent analysis reveals that 40-44% of cyber insurance claims are being denied, leaving organizations exposed to massive financial losses despite having paid substantial premiums.

This comprehensive analysis examines specific insurance coverage gaps experienced across different industry sectors following cybersecurity incidents. The research draws from 25 peer-reviewed studies, recent high-profile incidents including Change Healthcare ($2.4 billion impact), CrowdStrike global outage ($5.4 billion in losses with less than 20% insurance coverage), and emerging trends in cyber insurance markets.

Key findings demonstrate systematic coverage failures across all sectors:

Financial services face particular vulnerability in catastrophic risk scenarios, with traditional business interruption coverage failing in 70% of incidents due to waiting periods that exclude most real-world cyber events. Healthcare organizations encounter unique challenges with regulatory compliance costs, where HIPAA violations and state privacy law penalties often fall outside standard coverage scope.

Manufacturing and critical infrastructure sectors experience the most severe gaps in cyber-physical damage coverage, as standard cyber policies explicitly exclude physical property damage and bodily injury caused by cyber events. The energy sector shows widespread underinsurance due to lack of domain-specific risk models, resulting in elevated premium-to-revenue ratios that discourage adequate coverage.

Small and medium enterprises across all sectors face barriers from unclear policy language and insufficient baseline controls, with 28% of organizations under 250 employees unable to obtain any cyber policy in 2023 due to stricter underwriting standards.

The most critical coverage gaps identified include:

• Business interruption failures: Traditional coverage requires 8-24 hour waiting periods that exclude most cyber incidents

• Supply chain vulnerabilities: Third-party risks account for 59% of breaches but receive only 10-25% coverage sub-limits

• Nation-state exclusions: War exclusions now explicitly exclude state-backed cyber operations following Lloyd's mandate

• Emerging technology risks: AI, IoT, and cloud infrastructure dependencies create unaddressed exposure gaps

• Regulatory compliance costs: Expanding disclosure requirements under SEC and international frameworks often exceed coverage

This analysis provides sector-specific recommendations for organizations to identify, evaluate, and address coverage gaps before they become catastrophic financial exposures. The research emphasizes that while cyber insurance remains a vital component of risk management, organizations must treat it as a complement to robust cybersecurity practices rather than a standalone solution.

Subscribe to CybersecurityHQ Newsletter to unlock the rest.